George Carlin: The Life Story Behind the Rebel Comedian
In this post
George Carlin was a comedian who made people laugh and think at the same time, and he did it by saying the things that other people were afraid to say. He talked about words, about religion, about politics, about the environment, and about the way language is used to hide the truth, and he did it with a precision that made his jokes feel like arguments, and his arguments feel like jokes. He started as a clean-cut comic in a suit, telling safe jokes on television, and he ended as a bearded rebel in jeans, telling the truth as he saw it, even when it made people uncomfortable. That change, from safe to dangerous, is the heart of his story.
He was born in New York City in 1937, he grew up in Manhattan, and he was a bright, funny child who loved words and who was always in trouble at school. He joined the Air Force, he worked in radio, and he became a comedian in the 1960s, performing with his partner Jack Burns, and then on his own, in clubs and on television. He was successful, but he was bored, and he felt that his jokes were not saying anything real. In the early 1970s he changed his act, he grew his hair, he grew a beard, and he began to talk about the things that mattered to him, starting with the seven words you cannot say on television, a routine that led to a Supreme Court case and that made him famous.
Carlin worked for fifty years, he made more than twenty HBO specials, he wrote books, and he performed until the year he died, in 2008, at the age of seventy-one. He was not a man who retired, and he was not a man who softened with age. He got angrier, sharper, and funnier as he got older, and his later work, about the environment, about consumerism, and about the power of language, is still quoted today. His story is about a man who found his voice late, and who used it, loudly, for the rest of his life.
A Funny Kid on West 121st Street
George Denis Patrick Carlin was born on 12 May 1937 in New York City, in Manhattan, the second son of Patrick Carlin, a manager for a newspaper advertising department, and Mary Bearey Carlin, a secretary. His parents were Irish-American, and his father left the family when George was only a few months old, leaving his mother to raise George and his older brother Patrick on her own. The family lived in an apartment on West 121st Street, in a neighbourhood called Morningside Heights, and George grew up in a world of Irish Catholic families, of church, of school, and of the streets of New York, where a funny kid could make a living by making people laugh.
He was a bright child, and he loved words, reading, and making up voices. He went to Corpus Christi School, a Catholic school, and he was often in trouble for talking, for joking, and for not following the rules. He was expelled from several schools, and he later said that he learned more from the streets and from books than he did from school. He loved radio, he loved comedy, and he loved the sound of words, and he spent hours listening to comedians on the radio, imitating their voices, and learning how a joke works. He was not a good student in the usual sense, but he was a good observer, and he watched people, and he listened to how they talked, and that listening became the foundation of his comedy.
At the age of seventeen, he joined the United States Air Force, in 1954, and he was trained as a radar technician, stationed in Louisiana and in Texas. He was not a good airman, and he was often in trouble for being late, for joking, and for not following orders, and he was court-martialled three times. He also began to work in radio while he was in the Air Force, as a disc jockey, and he discovered that he had a talent for talking, for making people laugh, and for using his voice to entertain. He was discharged from the Air Force in 1957, and he moved back to New York, where he began to work in radio and in comedy, determined to make a living by making people laugh.
He worked as a disc jockey in Boston and in Fort Worth, Texas, where he met Jack Burns, another young comedian, and the two men formed a comedy team, Burns and Carlin, performing in clubs and on television. They were a traditional comedy duo, with Burns as the straight man and Carlin as the funny man, and they were successful, appearing on The Tonight Show and on other programmes. But Carlin was restless, and he felt that the act was too safe, too clean, and too much like other comedy acts. He wanted to say something real, and he wanted to be himself, not a character in a suit. The partnership ended in 1962, and Carlin went solo, wearing a suit, telling clean jokes, and becoming a popular television comedian.
The Suit, the Clubs, and the First Fame
In the 1960s Carlin was a successful, clean-cut comedian, wearing a suit and tie, with short hair, performing on television variety shows, in nightclubs, and on The Ed Sullivan Show. He did impressions, he told jokes about the weather, about hippies, and about everyday life, and he was good at it. He made records, he appeared on television, and he was liked by audiences who wanted safe, funny entertainment. He also did a famous routine about the “hippy-dippy weatherman,” a cheerful, slightly stoned weather reporter, which became one of his signature bits, and which showed his talent for voices and for character comedy.
But by the late 1960s, Carlin was bored. He was performing for audiences who wanted the same jokes, night after night, and he felt that he was not saying anything true. He was also watching the world change, with the Vietnam War, with the civil rights movement, and with a new generation of young people who were questioning authority, and he wanted his comedy to reflect that change. He began to grow his hair, to grow a beard, and to change his clothes, from a suit to jeans and a T-shirt, and he began to change his act, from clean jokes to sharper, more honest material about drugs, about religion, and about the words people were not allowed to say.
The change was risky, because it meant losing his television work, losing his safe audience, and starting again in small clubs, for young audiences who liked his new style. He did it anyway, because he believed that comedy should be honest, and that a comedian who is not honest is not a comedian at all. He lost money, he lost bookings, and he was criticised by people who liked his old act, but he gained a new audience, a younger audience, who loved his new material, and who saw him as a truth-teller, not only as a funny man. That audience would stay with him for the rest of his life.
In 1972 he recorded his album Class Clown, which included the routine “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television,” a list of seven swear words that Carlin said could not be said on television. The routine was funny, and it was also a serious point about language, about censorship, and about the power of words. He argued that words are only words, and that the fear of words is silly, and that the government should not tell people what they can and cannot say. The routine became famous, and it also became controversial, and it would lead to a legal case that went to the Supreme Court.
Seven Words and the Supreme Court
In 1973 a radio station in New York, WBAI, played Carlin’s “Seven Words” routine in the afternoon, and a listener complained to the Federal Communications Commission, the FCC, which regulates broadcasting in America. The FCC said that the routine was indecent, and that it could not be broadcast at a time when children might be listening. The case went to court, and in 1978 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled, in the case FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, that the government could regulate indecent language on radio and television, especially during the day. Carlin did not go to jail, and he was not fined, but his routine became the centre of a national debate about free speech, about censorship, and about the power of words.
Carlin was proud of the case, and he talked about it for the rest of his life, not because he wanted to swear on television, but because he believed that language should be free, and that people should be allowed to hear words, even rude words, and to decide for themselves what they think. He also believed that the words themselves were not the problem. The problem was the fear of words, and the way that fear was used to control people. His routine was not only a joke. It was an argument, and it was an argument that is still discussed today, in schools, in law courts, and in debates about free speech on the internet.
After the case, Carlin became even more famous, and he began to make HBO specials, starting in 1977, which allowed him to perform without censorship, to say what he wanted, and to reach a large audience. He made more than twenty HBO specials over the next thirty years, and they became the core of his career, showing his evolution from a young comic to an older, angrier, and funnier man. He also hosted the first episode of Saturday Night Live in 1975, a show that would become famous for its comedy, and he was the first host, a fact that is often forgotten, but that shows how respected he was in the comedy world.
He also wrote books, including Brain Droppings, Napalm and Silly Putty, and When Will Jesus Bring the Pork Chops?, which collected his jokes, his observations, and his thoughts about language, religion, and politics. The books were bestsellers, and they showed that Carlin was not only a stand-up comedian, but also a writer, a thinker, and a man who loved words. He kept notebooks full of words, phrases, and ideas, and he worked on his material constantly, refining a joke, changing a word, and looking for the perfect way to say something. That attention to language is what made him different from other comedians, and it is what makes his work still worth reading today.
HBO, Books, and the Angry Old Man
In the 1980s and 1990s Carlin’s comedy became darker, angrier, and more political. He talked about religion, saying that he did not believe in God, and that religion was a way of controlling people. He talked about politics, saying that politicians were liars, and that the government served the rich, not the people. He talked about the environment, saying that the planet would survive, but that humans might not, and that we should not worry about saving the Earth, because the Earth does not need saving. We do. He talked about consumerism, about advertising, and about the way language is used to hide the truth, with euphemisms like “collateral damage” for dead civilians, and “downsizing” for firing people. His jokes were sharp, and they were often uncomfortable, but they were also funny, because they were true.
He performed in large theatres, he toured the country, and he made HBO specials every few years, each one showing a new side of his thinking. He was not a young man anymore, and he did not try to be. He was an old man with a beard, in a black shirt, talking about the world as he saw it, and his audience, which was now older too, loved him for it. He was also open about his personal life, talking about his wife Brenda, who died in 1997, about his heart problems, about his drug use in the 1970s, and about his struggles with addiction. He was honest about his flaws, and that honesty made his comedy stronger, because the audience knew that he was not pretending to be perfect.
He had heart problems for many years, and he had several heart attacks, and he had surgery, but he kept performing, because performing was his life, and because he believed that a comedian should work until he could not work anymore. He recorded his last HBO special, It’s Bad for Ya, in March 2008, just three months before he died, and in it he talked about death, about religion, and about the world, with the same anger and the same humour that had defined his career. He died on 22 June 2008 in Santa Monica, California, at the age of seventy-one, from heart failure, and his death was reported around the world, with tributes from comedians who said that he was the greatest stand-up of all time.
He was married twice, first to Brenda Hosbrook, from 1961 until her death in 1997, with whom he had a daughter, Kelly, and then to Sally Wade, from 1998 until his death. He was a private man in many ways, but he was open on stage, and he used the stage to say what he thought about the world, even when it was unpopular. His legacy is not only his jokes, but also his way of thinking about language, about power, and about the truth, and that legacy is still felt today, in the work of comedians who cite him as their greatest influence.
Language, Euphemisms, and the Power of Words
Carlin loved words, and he spent his life studying them, collecting them, and using them with precision. He kept lists of words, he read dictionaries, and he thought about how language changes, and how it is used to hide the truth. His most famous routine about language was about euphemisms, the soft words that are used to make a hard truth sound softer. He gave the example of “shell shock” in the First World War, which became “battle fatigue” in the Second World War, which became “operational exhaustion” in Korea, which became “post-traumatic stress disorder” in Vietnam, a phrase so long and so soft that it hides the pain it describes. Carlin argued that the longer the phrase, the more it hides, and that we should use short, clear words, even if they are painful, because clear words tell the truth.
He also talked about the words that are used in advertising, in politics, and in business, to make a bad thing sound good. He called it “soft language,” and he said that it was a way of controlling people, by making them accept things they would not accept if they were described clearly. That idea, that language is power, and that those who control language control people, is at the heart of his work, and it is why his comedy is still studied in schools, in universities, and in books about language. He was not only a comedian. He was a linguist, a philosopher, and a critic of power, and he used jokes to make his points, because jokes are easier to remember than lectures.
Why Carlin Still Matters to Comedians
Every stand-up comedian working today, from the most famous to the newest, has been influenced by Carlin, whether they know it or not. He changed stand-up by showing that a comedian could talk about serious things, about religion, about politics, about language, and still be funny. Before Carlin, most comedians told jokes about their wives, about their mothers-in-law, and about everyday life. After Carlin, comedians felt free to talk about anything, to be angry, to be political, and to use their stage to say what they believed. That freedom is his greatest legacy, and it is one that is still felt in comedy clubs, on television, and on the internet, where comedians talk about the world as they see it, without asking for permission.
His HBO specials are still watched, his books are still read, and his routines about the seven words, about euphemisms, and about the planet are still quoted, often by people who were not born when he performed them. That lasting fame is a sign of how strong his work was, and how true his observations were. He talked about the world in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and much of what he said is still true today, which is both a compliment to him and a sad comment on the world. He would probably have laughed at that, and he probably would have been angry too, because he wanted the world to change, not to stay the same.
The Notebooks, the Dictionaries, and a Life with Words
Carlin kept notebooks full of words, phrases, and ideas, and he worked on his material constantly, refining a joke, changing a word, and looking for the perfect way to say something. He read dictionaries, he collected slang, and he thought about how language changes, and how it is used to hide the truth. His notebooks, which are now in the National Comedy Center in Jamestown, New York, are a record of a man who loved words, and who treated them with care, like a craftsman treats his tools. He did not write a joke once and forget it. He wrote it, he tested it on stage, he changed it, and he wrote it again, until it was right. That attention to detail is what made his comedy so precise, and so memorable, and it is why his routines are still studied today, by comedians, by writers, and by linguists, who see in his work a serious study of language, disguised as jokes.
He also wrote books, which collected his jokes, his observations, and his thoughts, and which became bestsellers, because readers wanted to see his words on the page, as well as hear them on stage. His books are funny, and they are also thoughtful, and they show a man who was not only a stand-up comedian, but also a writer, a thinker, and a critic of power. He believed that words matter, and that the way we use them shapes the way we think, and he spent his life proving that, one joke at a time, in clubs, on television, and in books that are still read today. He also performed in small clubs, in Las Vegas, and in other cities, where he tested new material, and where he learned what worked, and what did not, by watching the audience, and by listening to their laughter, or their silence. That testing, night after night, in front of a live audience, is the hard work of comedy, and Carlin did it for fifty years, refining a joke, changing a word, and looking for the perfect way to say something. That work, done in clubs, in the dark, with a microphone, is the foundation of his HBO specials, and of his books, and it is why his comedy feels so precise, so tested, and so true.
My Take:
I think George Carlin is the comedian I learn the most from, even though he makes me uncomfortable, because he does not let me laugh and forget. He makes me laugh and then he makes me think, and the thinking stays with me after the laughter stops. I have watched his routines about language, about euphemisms, and about the seven words, and each time I learn something new about how words work, and about how they are used to hide the truth. That is a rare gift for a comedian, to be funny and to be educational at the same time, and Carlin had it in a way that few others have.
What I admire most is his honesty. He started as a clean-cut comic in a suit, telling safe jokes, and he was successful, but he was bored, and he knew that his jokes were not true. He could have stayed safe, he could have kept earning money, and he could have been a popular television comedian for the rest of his life. Instead he changed, he grew his hair, he grew a beard, and he began to tell the truth as he saw it, even when it cost him bookings, even when it made people angry. That takes courage, and it is a kind of courage that I respect deeply, because it is easy to be safe, and hard to be honest, especially when honesty costs you money.
The seven words routine is the part of his story that I think about most, because it is both a joke and a serious argument about free speech. He listed seven words that could not be said on television, and he asked why. Why are these words bad, and who decides? That question is simple, and it is powerful, and it led to a Supreme Court case that is still taught in law schools today. I think about that case when I think about free speech on the internet, where words are still censored, where people are still told what they can and cannot say, and where the fear of words is still used to control people. Carlin was right in 1972, and he is still right today: words are only words, and the fear of words is the real problem.
I also love his routine about euphemisms, because it changed the way I listen to the news. When I hear a politician say “collateral damage,” I now think of Carlin, and I think: that means dead civilians. When I hear “downsizing,” I think: that means people lost their jobs. That kind of listening, of translating soft language into clear language, is a skill that Carlin taught me, and it is a skill that I use every day, when I read the news, when I listen to an advertisement, and when I hear someone trying to hide a hard truth behind a soft word. I am grateful to him for that skill, because it makes me a better listener, and a harder person to fool.
I have mixed feelings about his anger, and I want to be honest about that. In his later years, Carlin became angrier, and his comedy became darker, and some of his jokes feel bitter, as if he has given up hope that the world will change. I understand that anger, because the world did not change as much as he hoped, and because he watched politicians lie, and corporations grow richer, and the environment suffer, and he felt powerless to stop it. But I also think that anger, even when it is justified, can make a person tired, and can make an audience tired too. I love his early work, when he was angry but also hopeful, and I find his late work harder to watch, because the hope is gone, and only the anger is left. That is a sad thing, but it is also an honest thing, and I respect him for being honest, even when honesty is not hopeful.
His personal life, and his struggles with drugs and with his heart, are parts of his story that I think about with respect. He was open about his drug use in the 1970s, and about his heart problems, and he did not pretend to be perfect. He talked about his wife Brenda, who died in 1997, and about how much he loved her, and about how her death affected him. That openness, about his flaws and about his grief, made his comedy stronger, because the audience knew that he was not pretending. He was a man, with problems, like everyone else, and he used those problems to make jokes that were true. I think that is a brave way to live, to be honest about your flaws, and to use them, rather than hiding them.
I also think about his childhood, and about how a boy who was expelled from school, who joined the Air Force, and who was court-martialled three times, became one of the greatest comedians of all time. That is a hopeful story, because it shows that school is not the only place to learn, and that a person who does not fit into the system can still succeed, by finding their own way. Carlin found his way through radio, through comedy clubs, and through words, and he proved that a funny kid from New York, who loved words, could change the way America talks about language, about religion, and about power. That is an inspiring story, and it is one I want to remember.
I do not think every Carlin routine is perfect, and I do not think his work is all equal. Some of his later jokes feel repetitive, as if he is saying the same thing about politicians and corporations again and again, without finding a new way to say it. Some of his routines about religion feel harsh, as if he is angry at believers, not only at organised religion, and that harshness can feel unfair to people who find comfort in faith. I say that because I think it is important to be honest, even about a comedian I admire. His best work, the seven words, the euphemisms, and the routines about language, is so strong that it does not need every joke to be perfect. The peaks are high enough, and the truth in those peaks is enough to carry his name.
What I take from his life is a lesson about language. Words matter, and the words we use shape the way we think, and the way we are controlled. Carlin taught me to listen carefully, to notice when a soft word is hiding a hard truth, and to use clear words, even when they are painful. That is a lesson I use every day, and it is a lesson that has made me a better reader, a better listener, and a harder person to fool. I hope the reader takes that lesson too, and that the next time they hear a politician say a soft word, they think of Carlin, and they ask: what does that really mean?
If I could ask Carlin one question, I would ask him what he thought about the internet, and about the way language is used there, with new euphemisms, new censored words, and new ways of hiding the truth. I think he would have a lot to say, and I think he would be both funny and angry, because the internet has made his points even more relevant, not less. He would probably say that the seven words are still banned, in new ways, and that soft language is still used to control people, and that we still need comedians who tell the truth. I wish he were here to say it, and I am glad we have his recordings, his books, and his routines, to remind us of what he said.
In the end, I think Carlin teaches me that comedy can be serious, and that a joke can be an argument, and that a comedian can be a philosopher, if he loves words enough, and if he is brave enough to say what he thinks. He was born in New York, he grew up in Manhattan, he joined the Air Force, he worked in radio, and he became a comedian who changed the way America talks. He did it by being honest, by being angry, and by being funny, all at the same time, and that is a rare combination. I hope the reader watches one of his HBO specials, listens to his routine about euphemisms, and thinks about the words they hear every day. That is what Carlin wanted, I think: not only laughter, but thinking, and not only thinking, but a clearer way of seeing the world.
I also think about his notebooks, and about how they are now in the National Comedy Center, where visitors can see them, and where comedians can study them. Those notebooks are a record of a man who loved words, and who treated them with care, and they show that comedy is not only about being funny in the moment. It is about work, about writing, about revising, and about caring for language, one word at a time. I think about my own notebooks, and about how I write down ideas, and how I revise them, and I feel a connection to Carlin, who did the same thing, for fifty years, with a dictionary on his desk, and a pen in his hand. That is a humble image, of a comedian as a writer, and it is one I want to keep.
There is a lesson in his daughter Kelly’s work, and in her book about her father, that I want to mention, because it shows a different side of Carlin, as a father, and as a man who loved his family, even when he was on the road, even when he was famous. Kelly has written about growing up with a famous father, about his drug use, about his heart problems, and about his love for her mother, Brenda, and her book is honest, and moving, and it shows that Carlin was not only a comedian, but also a father, who tried his best, even when he failed. I respect Kelly for writing that book, and I respect Carlin for being a father who, despite his flaws, loved his daughter, and who is remembered by her with love, as well as with honesty.
I think about the Supreme Court case, and about how it is still taught in law schools, and about how Carlin’s seven words are still a test of free speech, even today, on the internet, where words are censored in new ways. I wonder what Carlin would say about social media, about cancel culture, and about the new ways that language is controlled, and I think he would have a lot to say, and that he would be both funny and angry, because the issues he raised in 1972 are still with us, in new forms. His work is not dated. It is more relevant than ever, and that is a sign of how true his observations were, and how little the world has changed, in the ways that matter most.
Finally, I want to say something about his heart, and about how he had heart problems for many years, and how he kept performing, even after heart attacks, even after surgery, because performing was his life. That dedication, to work until you cannot work anymore, is admirable, and it is also a little sad, because it shows a man who did not know how to stop, and who needed the stage, even when his body was failing. I think about that, and about how I will know when to stop, in my own work, and I do not have an answer, but I admire Carlin for working until the end, and for recording his last special, It’s Bad for Ya, three months before he died, with the same anger, and the same humour, that had defined his career. That is a fitting end, for a man who lived to make people laugh, and think, and who did it until he could do it no more.
I also think about his last special, and about how he recorded it three months before he died, and how he talked about death, and about religion, with the same humour he had always had. That is a brave way to end a career, to talk about death, when you know you are dying, and to make people laugh about it, even as you face it yourself. I respect that, and I think it is a fitting end for a man who spent fifty years talking about the things other people were afraid to talk about.
Frequently Asked Questions
When was George Carlin born?
George Carlin was born on 12 May 1937 in New York City, in Manhattan. He grew up on West 121st Street, was expelled from several schools, and joined the Air Force at seventeen.
What are the seven words George Carlin talked about?
The seven words were a list of swear words that Carlin said could never be said on television, in a routine from his 1972 album Class Clown. The routine led to a radio broadcast that resulted in the Supreme Court case FCC v. Pacifica Foundation in 1978.
Why did George Carlin change his comedy style?
In the late 1960s Carlin grew bored with his clean, safe television act and felt it was not honest. He grew his hair and beard, changed to jeans, and began performing sharper, more political material in small clubs for younger audiences.
How many HBO specials did George Carlin make?
Carlin made more than twenty HBO specials, starting in 1977 and continuing until 2008, the year he died. The specials are the core of his career and show how his comedy changed over thirty years.
Was George Carlin the first host of Saturday Night Live?
Yes, Carlin hosted the first episode of Saturday Night Live in 1975. He was a respected figure in comedy, and his hosting is often forgotten because the show later became famous for its cast.
When did George Carlin die?
Carlin died on 22 June 2008 in Santa Monica, California, at the age of seventy-one, from heart failure. He had recorded his last HBO special, It’s Bad for Ya, only three months earlier.
