Princess Diana: The Life Story Behind the People's Princess
In this post
Princess Diana was the most photographed woman in the world, and the most loved, and the most lonely, all at the same time. When she walked into a room, cameras turned towards her, and crowds pressed forward to see her, and children held out flowers for her to take. She smiled, she touched the hands that reached out to her, and she made people feel as if she had come to see them personally. Behind that smile, she was often unhappy, often afraid, and often alone in a palace that was not a home. That contrast, between the public love and the private pain, is the heart of her story, and it is why people still talk about her, more than twenty-five years after her death.
She was born Diana Frances Spencer on 1 July 1961 at Park House, on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk, England, to a family that had served the royal family for generations. She was not born a princess. She was born the daughter of an earl, a shy girl who loved animals, who liked to dance, and who was not a brilliant student. She grew up in a large house, she went to a boarding school, and she worked as a nursery teacher in London before her life changed forever. At nineteen, she met Prince Charles, the heir to the British throne, and at twenty she married him in a wedding that was watched by hundreds of millions of people around the world.
The marriage did not make her happy. It made her famous, and it made her miserable, and it ended in divorce. But in the years between the wedding and the divorce, Diana became something that no royal had been before: a princess who touched the sick, who held the hands of people with AIDS when others were afraid to touch them, who walked through minefields to draw attention to the danger of landmines, and who spoke openly about her own struggles with eating, with sadness, and with a marriage that had failed. She changed the royal family, and she changed the way the world saw royalty, and she did it by being human.
A Shy Girl at Park House and Althorp
Diana Frances Spencer was born on 1 July 1961 at Park House, Sandringham, in Norfolk, England, the fourth of five children born to John Spencer, later Earl Spencer, and Frances Roche. The Spencer family was one of the great aristocratic families of England, and Park House was a home on the Queen’s estate, where Diana grew up playing in the gardens and riding ponies. She was a shy, sensitive child, and she loved animals, especially horses and dogs, and she liked to dance and to swim. She was not a confident child, and she was not a star at school, but she was kind, and she had a way with younger children that her teachers noticed.
Her parents’ marriage broke down when Diana was still a child, and the divorce was painful for her and for her brothers and sisters. Her mother left the family home, and Diana, who was only seven years old, felt the loss deeply. She later said that the divorce shaped her life, and that it made her afraid of being abandoned, and that it made her want, more than anything, a happy family of her own. It was a wound that stayed with her, and it was a wound that the royal family, with its own rules and its own coldness, did not heal.
She went to school at Riddlesworth Hall and then at West Heath, a boarding school in Kent, where she was not a brilliant student but where she was known for her kindness, her love of music, and her talent for dance. She left school at sixteen, and she went to a finishing school in Switzerland for a short time, but she did not enjoy it, and she came home. She moved to London, where she lived in a flat with friends, and she worked as a nursery teacher at the Young England Kindergarten in Pimlico, a job she loved, because she loved children, and because the children loved her. She was nineteen years old, she was working for a modest wage, and she had no idea that her life was about to change completely.
She had met Prince Charles a few years earlier, when he had visited Althorp, the Spencer family home, and he had been dating her older sister Sarah. Charles was thirty-two, he was the heir to the throne, and he was under pressure to marry. Diana was young, she was beautiful, she was from a good family, and she was, in the eyes of the royal family, a suitable bride. They began to see each other in 1980, and the courtship was short, formal, and closely watched by the press. Diana was suddenly famous, and she was not prepared for it.
The Wedding the World Watched
On 29 July 1981, Diana married Prince Charles at St Paul’s Cathedral in London, in a wedding that was watched by an estimated 750 million people around the world. She wore a dress with a train that was twenty-five feet long, she arrived in a glass coach, and she walked down the aisle in front of a congregation that included royalty from around the world. It was a fairy tale, and the world believed it. The crowds in London cheered, the newspapers called her a princess, and the young woman who had been a nursery teacher a few months earlier was now the Princess of Wales, the future Queen.
The fairy tale did not last. The marriage was unhappy from the start, and Diana later said that she felt lonely and afraid, even on her wedding day. Charles was older, he was set in his ways, and he was still in love with another woman, Camilla Parker Bowles, whom he had known for many years. Diana knew about Camilla, and the knowledge made her miserable. She was also unprepared for the life of a royal: the constant attention, the formal duties, the press, and the rules of the palace, which told her what to wear, where to go, and what to say. She was a shy girl who had become the most famous woman in the world overnight, and she did not have the support she needed.
She gave birth to two sons, Prince William in 1982 and Prince Harry in 1984, and she loved them deeply. She was a hands-on mother, in a way that royal mothers had not been before. She took her sons to school, she took them to fast-food restaurants, she took them to visit homeless shelters and hospitals, and she tried to give them a normal childhood, even though they were princes. She wanted them to understand the world outside the palace, and she wanted them to be kind, and she succeeded. Her sons have spoken about her with love and with gratitude, and they have said that she was the best mother they could have had.
But the marriage continued to fail, and the press began to report on the problems. Charles and Diana lived apart, they argued, and they were both unhappy. Diana developed an eating disorder, bulimia, and she suffered from depression, and she later spoke openly about both, which was a brave thing for a princess to do. She also began to speak to the press, to tell her side of the story, and to show the world that the fairy tale was not true. It was a difficult time, and it was a lonely time, and it made her both more famous and more unhappy.
The Princess Who Touched the Sick
While her marriage was falling apart, Diana found a purpose in charity work, and that work became the most important part of her public life. She became the patron of many charities, and she visited hospitals, hospices, and shelters, not as a distant royal, but as a person who sat down, held hands, and listened. She was particularly known for her work with people who had AIDS, at a time when many people were afraid to touch them, because they believed, wrongly, that the disease could be spread by touch. Diana shook their hands, she hugged them, and she sat on their beds, and the photographs of her doing so were seen around the world, and they changed the way people thought about AIDS.
She also worked with homeless people, with children in hospitals, and with people who had leprosy, and she did it with a warmth that was rare among royals. She did not wear gloves when she met people, she did not keep her distance, and she did not treat charity as a duty to be performed quickly and then forgotten. She treated it as a human connection, and the people she met felt that. She was not a saint, and she was not perfect, but she was kind, and her kindness was real, and it made a difference to the people she touched.
In 1997, the year she died, she became involved in the campaign against landmines, and she travelled to Angola and to Bosnia to visit minefields and to meet the victims of mines, many of them children who had lost legs and arms. She walked through a minefield in Angola, wearing a protective vest and a visor, and the photographs of her doing so were seen around the world. She also met children in hospitals who had been injured by mines, and she held them, and she spoke about the need to ban landmines. Her work helped to draw attention to the issue, and it contributed to the international campaign that led to the Ottawa Treaty, which banned anti-personnel landmines, signed later in 1997.
Her charity work was not only about the causes she supported. It was also about the way she did it. She showed that a royal could be human, that a princess could touch, hug, and cry, and that those things were not weaknesses but strengths. She changed the royal family, and she changed the way the public expected royals to behave, and that change has lasted. Her sons, William and Harry, have continued her charity work, and they have spoken about how their mother’s example shaped their own lives.
Separation, Divorce, and a New Freedom
In December 1992, Charles and Diana announced their separation, and the fairy tale was officially over. The years that followed were difficult, and they were played out in public, in the newspapers and on television. Diana gave a famous interview to the BBC programme Panorama in 1995, in which she spoke openly about her marriage, her eating disorder, her depression, and her belief that there were three people in the marriage, a reference to Camilla. The interview was watched by millions of people, and it shocked the royal family, but it also made Diana more popular than ever, because she had told the truth, and the public believed her.
She and Charles divorced in August 1996, and Diana lost the title Her Royal Highness, although she remained the Princess of Wales. She was given a settlement, and she kept her home at Kensington Palace, and she continued her charity work, but she was no longer a working royal in the same way. She was free, in a sense, to live her own life, to choose her own causes, and to speak her own mind, and she did so with a new confidence. She was thirty-five years old, she was the most famous woman in the world, and she was, for the first time in her adult life, single.
She began a new life, with new friends, new interests, and a new sense of purpose. She continued her charity work, she spent time with her sons, and she began a relationship with Dodi Fayed, the son of the owner of Harrods, the famous London store. The press followed her everywhere, and the attention was intense, sometimes cruel, and sometimes dangerous. She complained about the press, and about the photographers who chased her, and she said that she felt hunted. It was a feeling that would prove to be tragically true.
In the summer of 1997, she went on holiday with Dodi in the south of France, and the press followed them. On the night of 30 August, they went to dinner in Paris, and they left the Ritz Hotel in a car, pursued by photographers on motorbikes. The car crashed in a tunnel in Paris, and Diana, Dodi, and their driver were killed. Diana died on 31 August 1997, at the age of thirty-six, in a Paris hospital. The news shocked the world, and the grief that followed was extraordinary.
The Death, the Grief, and the Flowers at Kensington Palace
The death of Princess Diana on 31 August 1997 was one of the most shocking events of the twentieth century, and the public reaction was unlike anything that had been seen before. People in Britain and around the world left flowers outside Kensington Palace, outside Buckingham Palace, and in cities everywhere, and the piles of flowers grew so large that they covered the ground. People cried in the streets, they wrote messages, and they queued for hours to sign books of condolence. It was a grief that was personal, even for people who had never met her, because they felt that they had known her, through the newspapers, through the television, and through the stories of her kindness.
Her funeral was held on 6 September 1997 at Westminster Abbey in London, and it was watched by millions of people around the world. Her brother, Earl Spencer, gave a speech in which he praised his sister and criticised the press and the royal family, and his words were met with applause from the congregation. Her sons, William, who was fifteen, and Harry, who was twelve, walked behind her coffin, in a moment that was painful to watch, and that has stayed in the memory of everyone who saw it. She was buried at Althorp, the Spencer family home, on an island in a lake, in a private place where her family could visit her in peace.
The grief also led to a crisis for the royal family, which was criticised for its response to her death, and for the fact that the Queen did not return to London immediately, and did not speak to the nation for several days. The public anger was intense, and it forced the royal family to change, to become more open, more emotional, and more in touch with the public. Diana, even in death, changed the monarchy, and the monarchy has never been quite the same since.
Her legacy is complex. She was not a perfect person, and she made mistakes, but she was loved, and she is still loved, because she was human, because she was kind, and because she showed that a princess could be a person, not just a symbol. Her sons have kept her memory alive, and they have spoken about her often, and they have continued her work. The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund, and the many charities she supported, continue to help people, and her name is still a symbol of compassion, of courage, and of the power of kindness.
The Panorama Interview and Speaking Her Truth
In November 1995, Diana gave an interview to the BBC programme Panorama, in which she spoke openly, for the first time, about her marriage, her eating disorder, her depression, and her belief that the royal family had not supported her. The interview was watched by more than twenty million people in Britain, and by millions more around the world, and it was a turning point, because it showed a princess speaking in her own voice, without the palace, without a script, and without fear. She said that there were three people in the marriage, a reference to Camilla Parker Bowles, and she said that she had suffered from bulimia, and from post-natal depression after the birth of her sons, and that she had sought help, and that she had survived. It was a brave interview, and it was also a controversial one, because it broke the rules of the royal family, which valued silence and discretion above all else.
The interview made Diana more popular than ever, because the public believed her, and because they saw her as a woman who had been wronged, and who had found the courage to speak. It also made the royal family angry, and it hastened the divorce, which was finalised in August 1996. Diana lost her royal title, but she kept her popularity, and she kept her freedom, and she used that freedom to continue her charity work, to travel, and to live her own life, in a way that she had never been able to do as a married princess. The interview is still studied today, as an example of a public figure telling the truth, and of the power of a single conversation to change a life.
William and Harry, and a Mother’s Legacy in Her Sons
Diana’s greatest legacy is her sons, William and Harry, who have spoken about her with love, and who have continued her work in their own ways. William, the elder, has become the Prince of Wales, and he has spoken about his mother’s kindness, about her sense of humour, and about the way she tried to give him and his brother a normal childhood, taking them to homeless shelters, to hospitals, and to fast-food restaurants, so that they would understand the world outside the palace. Harry, the younger, has spoken about his grief, about the pain of losing his mother when he was twelve, and about the way her example shaped his own charity work, including his work with wounded soldiers, and with children affected by HIV and AIDS in Africa.
Both sons have kept her memory alive, and they have both spoken about the importance of mental health, about the need to talk about grief, and about the need to be kind, lessons they learned from their mother. They have also, in different ways, struggled with the fame that Diana knew so well, and with the press attention that followed her, and that follows them, and they have tried to protect their own families from the same pressures that Diana faced. Their lives are a reminder that Diana’s story did not end with her death, but continues in the lives of her children, and in the work they do, and in the values she taught them, which were kindness, compassion, and the courage to be human.
My Take:
I think Princess Diana is one of the saddest and most compelling figures I have ever read about, and I say that because her story is not a simple fairy tale. It begins like a fairy tale, with a shy girl marrying a prince in a beautiful wedding, and it ends in tragedy, with a young woman dying in a car crash in Paris, chased by photographers. In between, there is a life that was both glamorous and miserable, both loved and lonely, both powerful and powerless, and that contrast is what makes her story so hard to forget. She had everything the world says you should want, and she was unhappy, and that unhappiness tells us something important about fame, about marriage, and about what really matters in life.
What I love most about Diana is her kindness, and I mean that in a simple, human way. She held the hand of a man with AIDS when other people were afraid to touch him, she sat on the bed of a sick child, she hugged a person with leprosy, and she did it without gloves, without distance, and without making a show of it. That kindness was not a performance. It was real, and the people she touched knew it was real, and the photographs of her doing it changed the way the world thought about those diseases. I think that is the most important thing she ever did, more important than any dress she wore or any party she attended, because it showed that a touch can be a kind of medicine, and that compassion can change a life.
I also think about how young she was when she married, and how unprepared she was for the life that followed. She was twenty years old, she had been a nursery teacher, and she was suddenly the Princess of Wales, the most famous woman in the world, with cameras following her everywhere, and with a husband who did not love her in the way she needed to be loved. No nineteen-year-old is prepared for that, and no twenty-year-old is prepared for a marriage to a man who loves someone else. I feel a great deal of sympathy for her, because she was set up to fail, by a system that wanted a suitable bride, not a happy wife, and by a family that valued duty over love. She did her best, and her best was not enough, because the marriage was broken from the start.
The part of her story that moves me most is her work with landmines, because it shows her at her bravest. She walked through a minefield in Angola, wearing a vest and a visor, and she knew that the ground she was walking on could kill her. She did it to draw attention to a cause, and she did it knowing that the photographs would be seen around the world. That is not a small thing. It is a princess putting her own safety at risk for children she had never met, in a country she had never visited, because she believed that the world should know about the danger. I admire that more than any other part of her public life, because it was not about her. It was about other people, and about a cause that mattered.
I think about her sons, William and Harry, and about what it must have been like for them to lose their mother when they were fifteen and twelve. They walked behind her coffin, in front of the whole world, and they did it with a dignity that was heartbreaking to watch. I think about the fact that they have spent their adult lives trying to live up to her example, and trying to keep her memory alive, and I think that is a testament to the mother she was. She was not a perfect mother, and she made mistakes, but she loved her sons, and she tried to give them a normal life, and they have never forgotten it. That love is her greatest legacy, more than any charity or any crown.
I want to be honest about the press, because the press is a central part of Diana’s story, and it is a part that makes me angry. The photographers who chased her, who followed her everywhere, who took photographs of her in private moments, and who were pursuing her car on the night she died, were doing a job, but they were also doing something cruel. Diana complained about being hunted, and she was right. She was hunted, and the hunt never stopped, even after she was divorced, even after she had left the royal family, even after she had asked for privacy. I think the press bears a heavy responsibility for her death, and I think the world should have learned a lesson from it about the price of fame and the danger of chasing a person for a photograph. I am not sure the world did learn, because the same thing still happens today, to other famous people, and that makes me sad.
I also think about the royal family, and about how cold it must have felt to Diana. She married into a family that valued tradition, duty, and silence, and she was a warm, emotional, open person who wanted to talk, to hug, and to be loved. The family did not know what to do with her, and she did not know what to do with the family, and the mismatch made them both unhappy. I do not think the royal family was evil, and I do not think Diana was a saint, but I think the system was wrong for her, and that she was wrong for the system, and that the marriage was a mistake that hurt everyone involved. The lesson is not that royalty is bad, but that a marriage should be based on love, not on duty, and that a young woman should not be chosen as a bride because she is suitable, but because she is loved.
Her interview with the BBC in 1995 is another part of her story that I find both brave and sad. She sat down, she told the truth about her marriage, her eating disorder, and her depression, and she did it on television, in front of millions of people. It was brave, because it broke the rules of the royal family, and it was sad, because it showed how lonely she was, and how much she needed to be heard. I think that interview helped a lot of people who were suffering in silence, because it showed them that even a princess could be unhappy, and that it was okay to talk about it. That is a powerful thing, and it is one of the reasons Diana is still loved today.
If I have a criticism, it is that Diana sometimes used the press in the same way the press used her, and that she was not always honest about her own role in the story. She complained about the photographers, but she also called them, she gave them stories, and she used them to tell her side of the marriage. That does not make her a bad person, and it does not make her responsible for her own death, but it does make her human, and it shows that she was playing a difficult game, in which she was both a victim and a player. I say this not to blame her, but to be honest about the complexity of her life, because a simple story about a good princess and a bad press is not the whole truth. The truth is more complicated, and more interesting, and more human.
I also think about the Panorama interview, and about how brave it was for a princess to sit down on television and tell the truth about her marriage, her eating disorder, and her depression. She broke the rules of the royal family, and she knew she was breaking them, and she did it anyway, because she needed to be heard, and because she believed that the public deserved to know the truth. That interview changed the way people saw her, from a beautiful princess in a fairy tale to a real woman who had suffered, and who had survived, and who was willing to speak. I think it also helped many people who were suffering in silence, because it showed them that even a princess could be unhappy, and that it was okay to talk about it, and to ask for help. That is a powerful gift, and it is one that Diana gave without knowing how many people she would help.
I think about her sons, William and Harry, and about the way they have kept her memory alive, and about the way they have tried to live by her example. William has spoken about his mother’s kindness, Harry has spoken about his grief, and both of them have worked for charities, for mental health, and for the causes their mother cared about. They are not perfect, and they have made their own mistakes, but they are trying, and they are trying because their mother taught them to be kind, and to care about other people. That is a legacy that is alive, and it is a legacy that will continue, in their children, and in the work they do, long after Diana’s death.
Another thought that stays with me is about the flowers at Kensington Palace, and about the grief that followed her death. People who had never met her left flowers, wrote messages, and cried in the streets, because they felt that they had lost someone they knew, even though they had only known her through photographs and television. That kind of grief is unusual, and it tells me something about the power of a public figure who is also a human being. Diana was not a distant queen, or a politician, or a movie star. She was a woman who touched people’s hands, who hugged sick children, and who smiled at strangers, and those small acts of kindness made people feel that she was one of them, and that her death was a personal loss. I think that is the highest compliment a public figure can receive: to be mourned as a friend, not as a star.
Finally, I want to say something about the lessons of her life for young women today. Diana was young, she was beautiful, and she was told that marrying a prince would make her happy, and it did not. She learned that happiness does not come from a title, or from a palace, or from a wedding watched by millions, but from being true to yourself, from helping others, and from finding a purpose that is bigger than yourself. That is a lesson that is still relevant, in a world that tells young women that beauty and fame are the most important things. Diana’s life shows that they are not, and that kindness, courage, and honesty are more important, and that they last longer than any dress or any crown.
What I take from Diana’s life, in the end, is a lesson about kindness and about the price of fame. Kindness is the thing that lasts, and fame is the thing that fades, and Diana’s kindness is still remembered, while the dresses and the parties are forgotten. Fame, on the other hand, can be a prison, and it can be dangerous, and it can take a person’s privacy, their peace, and even their life. I hope that we, the people who read about Diana, will remember the kindness, and will try to be kind in our own lives, and that we will also be more careful about the way we treat famous people, because they are human, and they deserve privacy, and they deserve peace. Diana did not get that peace, and that is the saddest part of her story. I also think about the way Diana’s story is told to young girls today, and about the danger of telling it as a fairy tale, with a prince and a wedding, and a happy ending that never came. Her story is not a fairy tale. It is a story about a young woman who married a prince, who was unhappy, who found a purpose in helping others, and who died too young, and that story is more honest, and more useful, than any fairy tale, because it teaches that happiness does not come from a title, but from kindness, and from being true to yourself.
Frequently Asked Questions
When and where was Princess Diana born?
Princess Diana was born Diana Frances Spencer on 1 July 1961 at Park House, Sandringham, in Norfolk, England, to John Spencer, later Earl Spencer, and Frances Roche. She grew up in Norfolk, went to boarding school, and worked as a nursery teacher in London before she married.
When did Diana marry Prince Charles?
Diana married Prince Charles on 29 July 1981 at St Paul’s Cathedral in London, in a wedding watched by hundreds of millions of people around the world. She was twenty years old, and Charles was thirty-two and the heir to the British throne.
How many children did Princess Diana have?
Diana had two sons, Prince William, born in 1982, and Prince Harry, born in 1984. She was a hands-on mother who took her sons to school, to fast-food restaurants, and to visit homeless shelters and hospitals, trying to give them a normal childhood.
What charity work was Princess Diana known for?
She was known for her work with people who had AIDS, whom she shook hands with and hugged at a time when many people were afraid to touch them, and for her campaign against landmines, including a famous walk through a minefield in Angola in 1997. She also worked with homeless people, sick children, and people with leprosy.
When did Diana and Charles divorce?
Diana and Charles separated in 1992 and divorced in August 1996, after a marriage that had been unhappy for many years. Diana gave a famous BBC Panorama interview in 1995 in which she spoke openly about the marriage, her eating disorder, and her depression.
When did Princess Diana die?
Princess Diana died on 31 August 1997 in Paris, at the age of thirty-six, after a car crash in a tunnel. Her funeral was held on 6 September 1997 at Westminster Abbey, and she was buried at Althorp, the Spencer family home.
